
- #Blackmagic disk speed test of macbook pro 2012 retina ssd 1080p#
- #Blackmagic disk speed test of macbook pro 2012 retina ssd mac#
#Blackmagic disk speed test of macbook pro 2012 retina ssd mac#
If you are considering the 13" MacBook or Mac mini, it's worth noting that Apple is expected to launch the M2 chip before the end of the year.

Since Spencer made his video, both Final Cut and DaVinci Resolve have been further optimised for the M1 chips. I think that 16GB of memory would have improved performance of the 13" MacBook significantly beyond what it already showed. Soon after these computers were released, he tested the 13" MacBook Pro with 8GB of memory. Spencer and Steve Martin run Ripple Training, and Spencer is probably the foremost authority on Apple Motion. The thread includes links to several reviews. If you search this forum, you'll find a long discussion thread about them. When these computers were released, the reaction was uniformly favourable. In your initial post, you expressed concern about the basic M1 chip used in the 13" MacBook Pro and the Mac mini. Many people use X-Rite's i1Display Pro, but Spyder is also popular. Speaking of monitors, you should include in your budget the cost of monitor calibration hardware and software. Leaves room, if needed, to purchase a new monitor, or simply to save some money.

The mini has the same specs as the 13" MacBook Pro, but at a more attractive price because it doesn't include a Retina display, keyboard and trackpad. You could split editing chores between the laptop screen and your LG monitor (also true of the 14" MacBook).

Also, it raises the question of how you feel about editing on a 13" laptop screen. However, note that it has a standard LCD Retina display. Otherwise, similar considerations as the 14" MacBook Pro above, but $300 less expensive. I have no doubt that the M1 chip with 16GB of memory will meet your current needs (more on this below). Based on what I've read about this laptop, and given your current requirements, I would not worry about heat and throttling. You could also decide that the Retina XDR display with ProMotion in itself is desirable. I would choose this over the Mac Studio if you need more mobility than the Mac Studio offers, and the 14" is one option if you're dissatisfied with the colour accuracy of the LG monitor.
#Blackmagic disk speed test of macbook pro 2012 retina ssd 1080p#
I think that it makes sense if you want the power (it has quite a bit more than you need for 1080p video), you're satisfied with the colour accuracy of your LG monitor, and a Mac Studio is mobile enough for your needs (2.7kg 9.5cm x 19.7cm x 19.7cm).ġ4" MacBook Pro with the M1 Pro chip ($2,000) This is easily the most powerful computer of the options. I was impressed enough that I'm having one made to order that meets my own needs. I used this computer for two weeks recently. Mac Studio with the M1 Max chip (US$2,000) Attachments Captura de ecrã 122459.png (25.37 KiB) Viewed 9785 times If you have any particular questions about the Mac Studio, I used the base Studio/Max for two weeks and I have an upgraded Studio/Max on order. In some cases, an M1 Mac mini would work out just fine and save a lot of money.

From a cost perspective, whether that's good depends on whether or not you already have those components.Īs Uli says, it would also be helpful to know more about what kinds of videos you want to make and what kind of footage you plan to shoot and edit. Part of the price of a MacBook is due to the inclusion of a Retina display, keyboard and trackpad. Others have the M1 Pro chip, which is itself very capable. Some versions of the 14" and 16" MacBooks have the same M1 Max chip that's in the Mac Studio/Max. Taking into account your budget, it would be very helpful to know whether you already have a monitor, keyboard and mouse to use with a desktop such as the new Mac Studio/Max, or whether you would have to buy those components. I'll just comment on Macs because it's what I know about.
